Prompt Response – Week 13

Greetings Earthkind!

As part of this class, we are required to publish a weekly response to a prompt given by our professor. This is my seventh prompt response!

Prompt

Though this week’s group of “genres” (Young Adult, New Adult, & Graphic Novels) all seem very different, they all have in common the fact that many people don’t feel that they are legitimate literary choices and libraries shouldn’t be spending money on them or promoting them to adults. The common belief is that adults still don’t or shouldn’t read that stuff. How can we as librarians, work to ensure that we are able to serve adults who enjoy YA literature or graphic novels? Or should we?

ResponseRazo, my cat, snoozing on the bed.

This is a complicated issue, mainly because it’s new to many people. I grew up with YA being a thing, so it’s not that big of a deal to me. I also grew up with the belief that any reading is better than not reading at all and to not judge others based on what they like to read.

There are three parts to this issue, in my opinion:

  1. How we categorize the genres.
  2. How we as library professionals view the genres.
  3. How we validate readers of the genres.

How we categorize the genres

In my library system, most YA is shelved as “Teen Fiction.” I feel like this type of categorizing might dissuade readers not in their teens.

However, our teen and adult Graphic Novels recently just got merged together into one category (the kids GN books are still separate).

I think that works.

On the flip side, I’m not sure that shelving YA and NA in with the adult or kids books is right, either. Perhaps the genres could be shelved on their own, separate from the teen label.

In thinking about ways to promote them (outside of the genre titles), I think it’s about appeal.

Displays could highlight appeal terms and focus less on the “genre” and more of what’s in the book.

With YA and GNs especially, integrated advisory seems like it would work. Many YA novels and Graphic Novels are being turned into films or television series, so a display or recommendation list could include movies, CD’s, and books.

How we as library professionals view the genres

As library professionals, we do NOT get to choose what is a legitimate genre or not. If my patrons want to read it, I will fight to keep those items on my shelves.

We also don’t get to choose who we think is allowed to read the genre. I still read (and thoroughly enjoy) children’s fiction. I shouldn’t have to feel devalued as a reader because of my reading tastes.

If I seem fired up about it; I am.

People read for many different reasons, and I don’t get to choose what I think they should read and enjoy. That’s not my job.

My job is to encourage them to read what they want to read and to feel good doing it.

How we validate readers of the genres

In thinking about ways to validate readers of these genres, I believe we should make them known and seem popular.

Patrons shouldn’t feel like they have to sneak over into the “young people’s area” to pick up a book. We should pull them out and highlight them.

In addition to that, I would recommend using staff picks, patron picks, and other similar display tactics to show patrons the books are enjoyed by all sorts of people, and that’s perfectly okay.

Overall, yes, I do think we should “work to ensure that we are able to serve adults who enjoy YA literature or graphic novels.”


Thank you for taking the time to read this response, and until next time, Happy Reading!